Search the Entire Blog

Saturday, 1 November 2014

Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShipTwo Crashes in New Setback for Commercial Spaceflight



Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
SpaceShipTwo, a rocket plane that was meant to carry well-heeled tourists on short if expensive rides to space, crashed in the Mojave Desert on Friday during a test flight, killing one of the two pilots.
The pilots, who have not yet been identified, were flying the plane for Virgin Galactic, the space tourism company created by the entrepreneur Richard Branson, and Scaled Composites, the company that designed and built the plane.
One pilot was able to parachute from the plane and was taken to a hospital with “moderate to major injuries,” said Ray Pruitt, the public information officer for the Kern County sheriff’s office in California.
The test was the first time SpaceShipTwo had flown using a new, plastic-based rocket fuel.


It was the second major accident in a week for the commercial space industry, which has been widely promoted in recent years as an alternative to costly government programs. On Tuesday, an unmanned rocket launched by Orbital Sciences Corporation of Dulles, Va., which was carrying cargo to the International Space Station, exploded 15 seconds after launching.

Continue reading the main story

Crash of a Test Flight


SpaceShipTwo and Orbital’s rocket are very different in design and purpose, but both are part of an effort to bring private investment into the space business, until now largely the realm of government agencies like NASA and the military.
Virgin Galactic, which hoped to begin tourist flights next spring, already has more than 700 reservations,initially sold for $200,000 a seat before rising to $250,000 last year.
The list of would-be astronauts includes celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio, Justin Bieber and Angelina Jolie.
Experts said it was too soon to tell when the effort would resume. “Virgin was out ahead of everyone else for space tourism,” said Michael Blades, the aerospace and defense industry senior analyst at Frost & Sullivan, a market research and consulting firm. “It will still happen, but it has been pushed way to the right.
“It is just like any kind of other new technology, especially when it comes to flight,” he continued. “You have your tests and you have your failures.”
Friday’s accident took place tens of thousands of feet above the desert. As planned, SpaceShipTwo was carried aloft by a larger plane, WhiteKnightTwo, then dropped at about 50,000 feet. In a tourist flight, SpaceShipTwo’s rocket engines would take it to the 62-mile-high boundary defined as the edge of space.
After the smaller plane was released, its motor ignited. The accident appeared to happen 60 to 90 seconds later, said Stuart Witt, the chief executive of Mojave Air and Space Port, where WhiteKnightTwo took off at 9:18 a.m. Pacific time.
“I knew something was wrong,” he said. “I didn’t know what. It wasn’t obvious at first.”
A radio call reported an anomaly. “And we waited,” he said.
The sheriff’s office received a call after 10 a.m. that an aircraft had gone down about 20 miles northeast of the city of Mojave. “We have located a debris field,” Mr. Pruitt said.
WhiteKnightTwo landed safely.
Via Twitter, Mr. Branson said, "I’m flying to Mojave immediately to be with the team.”
Virgin Galactic grew out of the success of the Ansari X Prize contest in 2004, for the first privately built and financed craft that could rise above the 62-mile boundary of space. Scaled Composites won the $10 million prize with a smaller version of SpaceShipTwo, an effort financed by Paul Allen, the co-founder of Microsoft.
Immediately after the X Prize, Mr. Branson announced his plans for a spaceship that would carry two pilots and six passengers on suborbital flights — in which the plane does not go into orbit but offers a few minutes of weightlessness at the top of an arcing trajectory.
Over the years, Mr. Branson has repeatedly said he hoped commercial flights would begin soon. This is the second time tragedy has struck the spaceport in connection with Scaled Composites; in July 2007, a rocket system test went awry, killing three people.


Most recently, he said that with the resumption of powered test flights, he hoped the first commercial flights would take off next spring. He and his family plan to be the passengers on the first operational flight.
Although SpaceShipTwo had flown 54 previous test flights, all but three were unpowered tests in which it glided to the ground. This was the fourth time its motor was ignited.
In May, Virgin Galactic announced it was switching to the plastic-based fuel from the rubber-based one it had used. Friday’s flight was the first powered by the new motor.
The previous version was problematic, causing strong vibrations in the spacecraft. In an article published last month in Popular Mechanics, Brian Binnie, a former test pilot for Scaled, said, “We had start-up instabilities and we had end-of-burn instabilities.”
While troubleshooting the problem, “we did everything but break down and pray to God to show us the light of day,” said Mr. Binnie, who has now moved to XCOR Aerospace, another company at Mojave that is building a suborbital space plane for tourists.
Marco Caceres, director of space studies at the Teal Group, a consulting firm, said that “in an age where it is very expensive to fly these vehicles, the pressure is to do the minimal amount of test flying.”
“So that may be something we have to take a look at,” he continued. “Everyone seems to be in need of more money to conduct more flights, so the pressure is to start operational flight too soon. Maybe we are being unreasonable here.”
Patricia Hynes, director of the New Mexico Space Grant Consortium, who organizes an annual symposium for people in the commercial space industry, said the accident “helps people understand why it’s never been done before.”

“This is a tough business,” she said.
Dr. Hynes has bought a Virgin Galactic ticket, and the news did not change her intention to fly. “No, absolutely not,” she said.
A second SpaceShipTwo plane is currently under construction.

Facts, Not Fear Misguided quarantine policies have the potential to cause more damage than the Ebola virus itself.

Facts, Not Fear

Misguided quarantine policies have the potential to cause more damage than the Ebola virus itself.

Oct. 24, 2014
Keep calm and use common sense.
By + More
Ebola has many symptoms and side effects, but fear doesn’t have to be one of them. Unfortunately, new state policies on quarantine for health care workers returning from West Africa are creating unnecessary controversy and unease instead of the reassurance Americans need most.
According to the World Health Organization, Ebola is transmitted by “direct contact (through broken skin or mucous membranes) with the blood, secretions, organs or other bodily fluids of infected people, and with surfaces and materials (e.g. bedding, clothing) contaminated with these fluids.” The virus is not airborne, and therefore not easily spread through casual contact. You can’t contract the disease by simply being around someone who has it, and it cannot be transmitted by people who do not have symptoms. The virus spread in West Africa in part because of burial practices and a lack of resources to manage the outbreak. In the United States, it seems unlikely that Ebola would be able to spread to the same degree.
However, the actions of some state officials would lead one to believe that we need to prepare ourselves for a dangerous pandemic. New York and New Jersey have both implemented mandatory 21-day quarantines for health care professionals returning from volunteer work with Ebola patients in West Africa. In the state of Maine, returning nursing volunteer Kaci Hickox recently battled with state officials over their insistence that she remain quarantined, even though she is not exhibiting Ebola symptoms. The state monitored her movements and even had a police car tail her on a recent bike ride. In Louisiana, attendees of an upcoming infectious diseases conference were told not to come if they’ve recently been exposed to Ebola patients.
These measures are unnecessary and an overreaction to the presence of Ebola in the United States. They also have the potential to create further harm by contributing to the culture of fear that has pervaded the country since the first Ebola patient came in. There is already widespread concern about the possible spread of the disease. Enacting policies that are not in line with what we know about Ebola or how it is spread reinforces misinformation and contributes to the anxiety of the general population. Policies that promote unnecessary quarantines also have the potential to discourage volunteers from going to West Africa to help battle the disease over there. As countless officials have said during the past couple of weeks, the best way to fight Ebola in the U.S. is to fight it in West Africa. A lack of volunteers would hamper those efforts. As Forbes points out, the average person has more to fear from the flu than Ebola. The flu is far more infectious and kills thousands of people every year. And yet, those who come down with the flu aren’t quarantined – they’re not even required to stay home from work. The state quarantine policies are an overreach and not in the best interests of public health.
Earlier this week, President Barack Obama said when speaking about the Ebola crisis, “We don’t just react based on our fears. We react based on facts and judgment and making smart decisions.” He is absolutely right and those are the guidelines that national and state officials should be following when determining a response. Undoubtedly, protection of the population is everyone’s top priority, but while Ebola is a new health risk for most Americans, it’s not necessarily one of the deadliest ones, and policies for returning health care workers should be consistent with the risk they pose. Misguided quarantine policies have the potential to cause more damage than the Ebola virus itself. 

Canada to stop giving visas to residents of West African countries with widespread Ebola

Canada to stop giving visas to residents of West African countries with widespread Ebola

Associated Press+ More


By ROB GILLIES, Associated Press
TORONTO (AP) — Canada has joined Australia in suspending entry visas for people from Ebola-stricken countries in West Africa in an attempt to keep the deadly disease away.
Canada's Conservative government said Friday it is suspending visa applications for residents and nationals of countries with "widespread and persistent-intense transmission" of Ebola virus disease.
Canada has not yet had a case of Ebola. Canadians, including health-care workers, in West Africa will be permitted to travel back to Canada, the government said.
The countries most severely hit by the worst Ebola outbreak ever are Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea. Canada receives very few travelers from those countries, which have no direct flights to Canada.
A similar move by Australia was slammed Wednesday by Dr. Margaret Chan, the World Health Organization's director general, who said closing borders won't stop spread of the Ebola virus.
Canadian Health Minister Rona Ambrose said in a statement the "number one priority is to protect Canadians." Canadian Immigration Minister Jason Alexander said the government would act in the "best interests of Canadians."
Kevin Menard, a spokesman for Alexander, said the move is similar to but a bit less restrictive than the one the Australian government announced this week. He later called it "considerably different."
"We have instituted a pause, but there is room for discretion and if we can be assured that someone is not infected with Ebola," Menard said in an email after declining to comment on the phone. He said the government was "doing anything we can to keep Ebola from coming to Canada."
Nancy Caron, a spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Canada, said that "a number of African countries have imposed stricter travel bans as have several other countries around the world. Other countries such as the United States have started to place restrictions on travelers from countries with Ebola outbreaks."
The government said Canadian citizens or foreign nationals with a visa and foreign nationals who do not require visas will continue to be screened at ports of entry in Canada and will be subject to appropriate health screening.
Declining to criticize the move, an Obama administration official said Friday that Canada remains an important partner in the effort to stop Ebola. The official was not authorized to discuss diplomatic relations by name and spoke on condition of anonymity.
David Fidler, an international law professor at Indiana University, said the moves by Canada and Australia place both countries in violation of the International Health Regulations, a 2005 World Health Organization treaty to which both are signatories.
The treaty "just seems to be disintegrating in this Ebola panic," Fidler said. "And to have countries like Australia and Canada be in the forefront of this is even more disheartening," he said, because they had been supportive of the international treaty meant to prevent panic during such a health crisis.
New Democrat Libby Davies of the Canadian opposition also criticized the visa ban, citing criticism by the World Health Organization and the World Bank and questioning the announcement's timing.
"Sending this announcement on a Friday afternoon only worsens concerns that this policy is a public relations exercise, and irresponsibly ignorant of what health experts have advised," she said.?
The International Health Regulations are designed to help the world fight infectious disease outbreaks that have the potential for international spread. They were revised and strengthened in the wake of the 2003 SARS outbreak.

Did the White House Push Firms to Dump the House Obamacare Lawsuit?

Did the White House Push Firms to Dump the House Obamacare Lawsuit?

Judicial Watch intends to find out. 

House Speaker John Boehner's office says rich Democrats are to blame for the House's difficulties finding legal representation. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, however, suspects a White House-led effort.
House Speaker John Boehner's office says rich Democrats are to blame for the House's difficulties finding legal representation. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, however, suspects a White House-led effort.
By + More
The conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch is seeking proof that Obama administration officials helped strong-arm two law firms into ceasing work on the House of Representatives' planned lawsuit against the administration.
The House voted in July to authorize the lawsuit, which would challenge the administration’s delay of the Affordable Care Act’s employer health insurance mandate. The resolution gave House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, authority to hire outside attorneys for the case, and he did so.
But the suit has not been filed three months after the unusual House vote, due in part to unreliable law firm partnerships.
Attorney Bill Burck of the firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan recently backed out of the lawsuit, Politico reported Wednesday, following a September exit by David Rivkin of BakerHostetler. The House’s contract with BakerHostetler allowed for payment up to $350,000, with $500 an hour for attorney fees.
Neither attorney responded to requests for comment on the lawsuit, and it’s unclear if they were paid for any work on the case. Boehner spokesman Kevin Smith says he doesn't know if they were paid, and the House Office of General Counsel did not respond to a request for comment.
Politico reports that political pressure from clients motivated the two firms to discontinue their work with the House. But Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton believes that pressure came – either directly or indirectly – from the executive branch.
“I think there’s a scandal behind this,” he says. “I don’t think it’s a grass-roots effort on behalf of firm clients going into the firm saying, 'It’s either them or us.' I think it’s run out of the White House or the administration generally. Whether I can prove it or not, I don’t know.”
Judicial Watch, an aggressive and litigious transparency advocate, intends to try. The group is drafting Freedom of Information Act requests seeking communications between the firms and officials, particularly those at the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services.
“If there was any messin’ to be done, it was probably done within those agencies or through those agencies from the White House,” Fitton says.
If the group comes up empty or is given a list of FOIA exemptions, Judicial Watch may sue.
“I can’t guarantee a lawsuit, but look, we sue a lot, so a lawsuit would not be surprising if they don’t comply with the FOIA law,” Fitton says.
Judicial Watch filed its own lawsuit against the employer mandate delay in October 2013, before Boehner and House Republicans announced their election-year plans for a similar suit. The Judicial Watch case was brought on behalf of Kawa Orthodontics, a Florida company whose owner, Dr. Larry Kawa, says he spent time and money in an effort to comply with the Affordable Care Act’s Jan. 1, 2014, implementation date for the employer mandate.
Kawa argues the harm may be amplified if the mandate – now slated for 2016 implementation – is delayed any longer.
Earlier this month the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit in Atlanta heard arguments on whether Kawa has standing to bring the suit. If the appeals court rules in his favor, the case will be returned to district court. The House lawsuit, if it's filed, is expected to face a similar dispute over standing.

Go to Top

Bargain-Basement Oil Could Spell Global Instability

Bargain-Basement Oil Could Spell Global Instability

Prices at the pump are at their lowest in four years, but the cheap oil that has U.S. drivers rejoicing may spell trouble – and opportunity.

A demonstrator throws stones during an anti-government protest Feb. 27, 2014, in Caracas, Venezuela. Falling oil prices could fuel unrest in the country, experts say.
A demonstrator throws stones during an anti-government protest Feb. 27 in Caracas, Venezuela. Falling oil prices could fuel further unrest there, as well as in Russia, Nigeria, Iran and other countries that depend heavily on oil revenue, experts say.By 


Russia’s reigning judo aficionado has been staggered by a one-two economic punch.
A Russian oil platform sits in the Caspian Sea on April 10, 2011. International sanctions and a steep drop in oil prices have forced Russia to agree to sell gas to Ukraine, experts say.
A Russian oil platform sits in the Caspian Sea in April 2011. International sanctions and a steep drop in oil prices have forced Russia to agree to sell gas to Ukraine, experts say.
A panel of experts said Friday that international sanctions and record-low oil prices forced Russian President Vladimir Putin to the bargaining table with Ukraine this week, spurring his administration to sell Kiev desperately-needed natural gas despite an ongoing armed conflict between the two countries. Russia, one of the region's top oil producers, really needs the money.
“There was pressure on Russia to at least come to some agreement on gas,” William Pomeranz, deputy director of the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Kennan Institute, said during the discussion at the Washington-based think tank. “Russia did enter this crisis with almost a half a trillion dollars in the bank. It is their rainy-day fund, but it is indeed raining in Russia, and indeed their money is going out.”
But the Kremlin, which draws the vast majority of its export revenue from oil and gas, isn’t alone in feeling the pain from falling crude prices. Even as American motorists rejoice over gas prices at or below $3 a gallon for the first time in four years, the 20-percent drop in crude oil prices – from more than $100 in 2010 to about $85 this week – threatens to destabilize so-called petro states that rely on oil revenue to prop-up their government coffers, from Russia to Iran to Nigeria.
At the panel, titled, “Impact of Low Oil Prices: Petro Power or Petro Poverty,” Pomeranz and five fellow experts broke down the situation country by country, including Venezuela, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria along with Russia. Each state, highly dependent on high oil prices, faces risks if bargain-basement oil prices - pushed well below $100 a barrel in part by an energy boom in the United States - continues to flood the global market.
THE MIDEAST
Saudi Arabia vs. Iran

Cracks are showing in the oil cartel the world loves to hate.
Saudi Arabia, OPEC’s biggest member, is fighting with Iran over market share in China, each country slashing prices to gain an edge over the other.  Meanwhile, Venezuela’s share-the-wealth populist government, - built on $100 a barrel crude prices – is reeling from the sudden lack of revenue. (More on that below.)
“They’re in this incredible rivalry with Iran now,” Kalicki said of Saudi Arabi, “kind of a showdown between the two across the Gulf and the Levant.”
As Wilson Center senior scholar David Ottaway described: “There’s an enormous scramble among oil producers for its share of the Chinese oil market. China has been going around the world buying the lowest price it can find.”
Iran and Saudi Arabia each have strong incentives to gain a foothold in China: Saudi Arabia has faced two to three years of especially high spending to quell social unrest in the wake of the Arab Spring, Ottaway said.
Meanwhile, Iran’s economy, already ailing from international sanctions over the country’s nuclear program, has been further weakened by the plunge in oil prices.
“Iran is really hurting,” Ottaway said.
But that presents potentially major opportunities for the United States.
Iran’s Nuclear Program
Iran’s oil revenue has fallen by 30 percent, and “enormous economic pressure” on top of that could make the country’s leadership more amenable to compromise with the West over its nuclear program, Ottaway said.
“Everybody who’s following this is wondering how this is going to affect the negotiation over Iran’s nuclear program,” he contended, “and whether they’re going to be willing to make exceptions because the economic situation is really difficult for them now.”
Interestingly, Russia, which has sided with Iran throughout their negotiations with the U.S. and the United Nations, could face potential conflicts of interest if American-led sanctions are ultimately lifted.
“From a certain standpoint [the Kremlin] doesn’t want to let another player onto the international market that will be competing with Russia on a number of levels,” Pomeranz said, notably energy exports.
Greater Price Stability
The United States also has another opportunity, Kalicki said: “A window, which is not a very wide one, to do some significant things in energy diplomacy.” In particular, he argued, the U.S. could push OPEC to restore the so-called “price band,” lower and upper limits on oil prices that Kalicki contended would bring “more predictability and stability” in global energy pricing.
OPEC instituted a price band in 2000, but it was abandoned just four years later as rising demand in China pushed prices through the artificial price ceiling.

The Hunger Games: Katniss delivers chilling message in Mockingjay trailer

A scene from film 'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1' – Courtesy photo.
A scene from film 'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1' – Courtesy photo.
The highly anticipated film, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 released a final trailer on Wednesday evening.
Mockingjay - Part 1 is the first part of the third instalment in the Hunger Games franchise, which finds Katniss (Jennifer Lawrence) in District 13 after the pivotal events of Catching Fire.
In the first trailer, we saw that Peeta Mellark (Josh Hutcherson), is still alive and held in the Capitol.In this final trailer, titled 'Burn', we see a glimpse of Peeta who, over a video link, manages to warn Katniss.
"They're going to kill everyone," Peeta tells Katniss. "You'll be dead by morning."
At the end of the trailer, Katniss delivers a chilling message to President Snow: "If we burn, you burn with us!"
Based on the first part of the final novel in Suzanne Collins' best-selling trilogy, the film is directed by Francis Lawrence with screenplay by Danny Strong and Peter Craig.
Mockingjay - Part 1 also stars Liam Hemsworth and the late Philip Seymour Hoffman. Game of Thrones actress Natalie Dormer will reappear as Cressida, while Julianne Moore has joined the cast as President Alma Coin.
The film is set to release on November 21.
Philip Seymour Hoffman and Julianne Moore in a scene from 'The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1'. – Publicity Photo
The trailer has already got excited fans line up to pre-book tickets for the upcoming film.